What Does a CMO Decide in the Age of AI? What Automates and What Doesn't
Published:
Last Updated:
Category: Marketing Strategy
Published:
Last Updated:
Category: Marketing Strategy

Authors: Shusaku Yosa
Bidding is automated, reports generate themselves, and creative can be produced in minutes. So what is left for people to decide? This article separates marketing decisions into those that can be automated and those that cannot.
This distinction defines the boundary of what automation can do.
Automated bidding makes it clear. Give it a target of lowering CPA and it will adjust bids far better than a person. But it will not judge whether lowering CPA is the right target for your business right now.
Set a CPA-reduction target while trying to reach new customers and delivery drifts toward the existing audience that converts easily. The numbers improve and the business does not move.
What you can hand over is fairly clear.
Bid adjustment, delivery scheduling, narrowing targeting. There is no longer a reason for people to do this work.
Gathering numbers from each tool and putting them in a table. If people are spending time on this, it is the first thing to automate.
Making several variations, watching the response, narrowing down. This cycle has become far faster.
What to say is a separate matter. Variations of the expression can be automated, but generating candidate messages requires knowing what the customer is struggling with.
Catching sudden changes in the numbers. More reliable than a person checking dashboards every day.
This is what becomes the centre of the CMO's job.
Chase volume this quarter, raise the average value, or try a new market?
This does not come out of past data. It is a judgment informed by the state of the business, competitor movements, and the board's intent.
Finding the campaigns with bad numbers can be automated. Whether bad numbers mean you should stop is a different question.
Has it only just launched, is the direction wrong, or has the market shifted? The same number means different things.
Finding the responsive segments within your existing audience is exactly what automation is good at.
But the decision to go after people you have never reached will not surface, because the data is built only from past contact. Opening a new market is something a person has to initiate.
When an ad causes a problem, "it was generated automatically" is not an explanation anyone accepts.
Even when you automate, decide who reviews the output before it goes out.
Easily overlooked, but this is a decision too.
Whether to apply the recommended settings a tool suggests. In most cases, following them improves the short-term numbers.
The problem is that the recommendation only sees short-term metrics. Suggestions to lean on the existing audience appear constantly, but the fact that continuing down that path dries up the pool of new prospects is not part of the suggestion.
If you decide against a recommendation, write down why. When you review later, you can check whether the call was right.
Automation does not only remove work. It generates new work as well.
Treat the second lightly and problematic wording or factual errors go out as they are. The greater the volume, the more you need a review mechanism.
The more automation advances, the larger the share of the outcome that rests on human judgment.
What raises the quality of a decision is not more data. It is whether you can read the numbers you already have in the context of the business.
Concretely, put these two in place.
Many organisations lack the second. Without a record of why a decision was made, the same mistake repeats.
Less execution, but more decisions. When execution filled the day, deferring a decision did not show. Once the execution is gone, an unmade decision becomes a visible delay.
Gathering the numbers. As long as time goes there, no time is freed for decisions. Worth doing before creative generation.
Give it the wrong target and it will proceed accurately in the wrong direction. Revisit periodically whether the target itself still fits the business.
The smaller the team, the greater the effect. When the person deciding also carries the execution, the execution crowds out the decisions. That said, adding so many tools that managing them becomes the work defeats the purpose.
The point of automation is to cut execution and free time for decisions. But when the numbers are scattered across different places, the gathering work remains.
Xtrategy manages campaign schedules alongside budget and KPIs on a single screen. With the inputs for a decision on one page, gathering time becomes thinking time.
When considering automation, separate whether the work is optimising toward a target or setting the target itself. The former you can hand over; the latter stays with you.

Project management tools sorted into three types: task, schedule, and budget-versus-actuals. Covers what each is good an...

Task management tools sorted by team and individual use. Covers six products — Todoist, Notion, Trello, Asana, Backlog, ...
How to build a task or kanban board, focused on column design and WIP limits. Covers the principle that columns represen...