FICILCOM Inc. LogoFICILCOM Inc.
  • Company
  • Company Overview
  • Mission · Vision · Values
  • Guidelines
  • Services
  • NeX-Ray
  • Xtrategy
  • Trial Job Change
  • Tsurugi
  • Recruit
  • Culture
  • Benefits
  • Process
  • FAQ
  • Open Positions
Contact
  1. Home
  2. Blog
  3. Marketing Glossary
  4. How to Design an NPS Survey: Audience, Questions, Responses, and Follow-Up

How to Design an NPS Survey: Audience, Questions, Responses, and Follow-Up

NPSアンケートの作り方|設問設計・集計方法・改善へのつなげ方

Published: 06/10/2026

Last Updated: 10/08/2026

Category: Marketing Glossary

Authors: Shusaku Yosa

Ready to put this into practice?

Start Xtrategy for free→

1-minute signup, free, cancel anytime

An NPS survey needs more than a rating question. Decide whose experience you are investigating, what decision the results will support, and who will follow up. Changes to audience, wording, or timing can change what the score means.

This guide covers survey operations, from eligibility through follow-up. Use the NPS calculation guide for category counts and arithmetic. Recommendation intent is distinct from actual referrals, purchases, or retention.

Choose a relationship or an experience question

A survey about an overall relationship differs from one following onboarding, a purchase, or support. Bain distinguishes these NPS uses. They share a scoring format but should not be presented as one interchangeable trend.

Purpose

Example audience and timing

Decision supported

Overall relationship

Eligible customers invited at a defined point

Investigate reasons by tenure or customer type

Onboarding experience

A defined period after onboarding completion

Review explanation and initial-use difficulties

Store pickup experience

Customers meeting the same completed-pickup condition

Investigate directions and handover problems

Specify the response unit. One representative of a business account does not necessarily represent every user at that company. If customers who cancelled or failed to complete a process are excluded, document the exclusion and the experience the survey cannot describe.

Use a recommendation question and an optional reason

The following wording is a starting point. Replace the service name and test whether a small group understands the intended experience before launching. AAPOR's survey guidance supports clear, neutral questions that avoid combining several concepts.

Question

Suggested wording

Design check

Recommendation

How likely are you to recommend this service to a friend or colleague? Choose 0–10.

Label 0 as not at all likely and 10 as extremely likely; do not preselect a score

Optional reason

What is the main reason for your score?

Allow the person to continue without answering

Optional follow-up permission

May a team member contact you to clarify your feedback?

Explain the purpose and contact method; allow refusal without disadvantage

Avoid invitations that imply the expected answer, such as asking satisfied customers to select 9 or 10. If satisfaction is relevant, ask it separately. Under the standard NPS categories, 9–10 are promoters, 7–8 passives, and 0–6 detractors. Passives are included in all valid responses used as the denominator.

Agree on collection and information handling

Choose frequency around the customer experience and response burden. There is no universally appropriate monthly or quarterly schedule. Prevent overlapping invitations to the same person. Do not let account owners invite only the people they expect to be happy.

Design field

Record before launch

Purpose and eligibility

Decision, date range, experience conditions, person or account unit

Invitation and deadline

Send date, close date, reminder rules, delivery failures

Validity and duplicates

Responses allowed per unit, which duplicate to retain, missing and out-of-range rules

Information handling

Purpose, authorized access, retention approach, contact point

Follow-up

Owner, urgent escalation route, deadline, completion record

Comparability

Changes in wording, language, channel, eligibility, and timing

An anonymous survey and an identifiable survey with individual follow-up are different arrangements. Explain who can identify respondents. Do not promise anonymity while routing named answers to sales. Ask people to avoid including unnecessary personal or third-party information in free text, and collect only what the investigation needs.

Inspect the response composition before the score

In a fictional example, all 500 eligible customers who completed onboarding receive an invitation and 100 provide valid ratings. The operational ratio of valid responses to invitations is 100 ÷ 500 = 20%. The opinions of the remaining 400 are unknown; the respondents cannot automatically be treated as all 500 customers.

Label this simple operational ratio clearly. Formal survey response-rate definitions may distinguish eligibility, delivery, and other dispositions. As AAPOR explains, the rate alone cannot establish survey quality or nonresponse bias.

  • Record eligible audience, invitations, failed deliveries, responses, valid ratings, and exclusions.
  • Compare respondent tenure, account type, and invitation channel with the eligible audience.
  • Reconcile promoter, passive, and detractor counts to all valid ratings.
  • Keep ratings valid when an optional reason is blank.
  • Match comparison conditions and avoid excessive segmentation of small groups.

Assign follow-up based on issues, not scores alone

A low score warrants investigation, but a high score does not make a serious problem harmless. Safety concerns, billing problems, and major service failures should follow the agreed escalation route regardless of rating. Treat categories as a way to organize feedback, not as a diagnosis of the person or a promise that passives will become promoters after a small change.

The following fictional worksheet illustrates ownership, not demonstrated improvement.

Reported issue

Investigation or action

Owner and closure

Setup instructions are difficult to find

Check the actual screen and route; consider revising the explanation

Onboarding owner records the change and verification

Pickup point is unclear

Inspect the store directions and physical route

Store owner records verification and relevant inquiries

Major service problem

Escalate without waiting for the survey report

Support lead records status, contact permission, and resolution

Where respondents permit contact, explain what was investigated and done. Do not ask them to change their rating or make a benefit conditional on a future high score. After a change, examine recurrence, inquiries, retention, and purchases separately from NPS. The LTV evaluation guide and OMO experience design guide can help connect customer feedback to operational questions.

To organize resulting initiatives, owners, and review dates, explore Xtrategy's features.

 

 

 

 

Table of Contents

  1. Choose a relationship or an experience question
  2. Use a recommendation question and an optional reason
  3. Agree on collection and information handling
  4. Inspect the response composition before the score
  5. Assign follow-up based on issues, not scores alone

 

Company

  • Company
  • Company overview
  • Mission · Vision · Values
  • Guidelines

Services

  • Services

Blog

  • Blog
  • Categories
  • Authors

Estimate

  • Estimate simulator

Careers

  • Careers
  • Culture & Work Style
  • Benefits & Systems
  • Hiring Process
  • FAQ
  • Open Positions

Policies

  • Privacy Policy
  • Anti-Social Policy
  • Information Security Policy

Contact

  • Contact

Social

  • X
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Pinterest
© 2026 Ficilcom Inc.

Related Articles

オリエンシートの書き方|代理店・制作会社への依頼精度を上げるテンプレート
Marketing Glossary07/28/2026

How to Write a Creative Brief: A Filled Example for the Problem, Audience, and Budget

Write a creative brief that separates facts, hypotheses and goals. A fictional B2B example covers audience, budget, excl...

Shusaku YosaRead more
ベンダーマネジメントとは?制作会社・代理店を「任せきり」にしない進め方
Marketing Glossary07/27/2026

Vendor Management: A Practical Review of Decisions, Quality, and Delivery

Manage vendor delivery with clear responsibilities, decision logs and evidence-based reviews. A fictional example separa...

Shusaku YosaRead more
RFP(提案依頼書)の書き方|制作会社・ベンダー選定で外さないための項目とテンプレート
Marketing Glossary07/27/2026

How to Write an RFP: A Filled Example with Mandatory Criteria and a Scoring Sheet

Build an RFP with a shared response table, mandatory checks and weighted scores. A fictional website example shows how t...

Shusaku YosaRead more