What Is a Focus Group Interview (FGI)? How to Conduct One, Benefits, Drawbacks & Depth Interview Comparison
Have you ever felt that surveys alone can't uncover what consumers truly think? Focus group interviews (FGI) are a leading qualitative research method for exploring the deeper psychology behind consumer opinions — the "why" that quantitative data can't reveal.
This article provides a comprehensive guide to focus group interviews — from their basic definition and purpose, to differences from depth interviews, advantages and disadvantages, step-by-step implementation, and key success factors.
A focus group interview (FGI) is a qualitative research method in which small groups of 4–8 participants with shared attributes discuss topics in a roundtable format. A moderator guides the discussion by posing questions aligned with the research theme, while participants freely share their opinions.
Common applications include evaluating products and services, understanding consumer needs, testing new product concepts, gauging reactions to ad creatives, and identifying pain points in the customer journey.
The defining feature of FGIs is the ability to leverage group dynamics — the interaction among participants. One person's comment can trigger memories or experiences in others, generating new insights and ideas that wouldn't emerge in one-on-one interviews.
The counterpart to focus group interviews in qualitative research is the depth interview (DI). Depth interviews are conducted one-on-one between an interviewer and a participant, making them ideal for deeply exploring an individual's thought processes and motivations.
The key factor in choosing between them is the nature of the research topic. Focus group interviews work best for topics that people feel comfortable discussing in front of others — product usability, brand image, daily purchasing habits. For these subjects, group dynamics can be maximized.
For personal and sensitive topics like finances, family situations, or health issues, depth interviews are more suitable since participants can speak candidly without worrying about others' reactions. They are also better for tracing detailed decision-making processes or uncovering latent needs.
Using both methods together is also effective — for example, running FGIs first to generate hypotheses, then using depth interviews to dig deeper into the findings.
Focus group interviews offer several key advantages.
First, they enable efficient data collection in a short time. With 4–8 participants per session, opinions can be gathered simultaneously, making FGIs more time-efficient than individual interviews.
Second, group dynamics spark broader thinking. Dialogue among participants can generate fresh ideas and insights. One person's opinion may elicit agreement or counterpoints from others, revealing perspectives that wouldn't surface in solo interviews.
Third, cross-segment comparison is possible. By organizing groups by age, gender, life stage, or product usage level, you can clearly identify differences in values and needs between groups.
Fourth, you gain direct access to consumer voices. This can uncover product improvements or usage scenarios that internal teams never anticipated.
FGIs also have several limitations that should be understood and addressed before conducting research.
First, they are not well-suited for exploring individual deep psychology. With multiple people present, some participants may hold back due to nervousness or social pressure, especially regarding negative topics or personal matters.
Second, conformity bias is a risk. When a strong-voiced participant dominates, others may be swayed by that opinion or feel pressured to agree with the group consensus. Skilled moderators must ensure no single perspective exerts undue influence.
Third, discussion quality varies between groups. Member compatibility and attribute differences can produce highly engaged groups alongside quieter ones. Conducting at least two groups is recommended for this reason.
Fourth, FGIs do not yield statistical data. They specialize in qualitative insights, and findings may not represent broader market trends. Combining FGI results with quantitative surveys for validation is essential.
Start by clearly defining what you want to learn. Whether it's gauging reactions to a new product concept, identifying improvement areas for existing products, or understanding your target audience's values, specific research questions are essential. Vague objectives lead to low-quality insights.
Select participants who match your research objectives and organize them into groups. Common segmentation criteria include age, gender, life stage (single/married, with/without children), and product usage level (heavy/light/non-user). Typically 2–4 groups are formed to enable cross-group comparison. Participant recruitment is conducted through research panel databases or your own customer lists.
Prepare an interview guide that serves as the discussion roadmap. A typical structure flows from icebreaker (introductions and warm-up questions) → introductory questions (broad, topic-related questions) → key questions (core research topic discussion) → wrap-up (overall reflection and follow-up questions). Set time allocation guidelines for each section.
Sessions typically last 90–120 minutes. The moderator follows the interview guide while ensuring all participants have equal opportunity to speak. Many venues feature one-way mirrors so client team members can observe in real time. Online sessions have become increasingly common, removing geographic barriers and enabling broader participant access. For online formats, limiting groups to 3–4 participants and 90 minutes is recommended.
After the interview, analyze the recordings (transcripts and video). Extract key themes and patterns from participant statements, and organize them using methods such as affinity diagramming. Share findings with stakeholders through a debriefing session and translate insights into actionable strategies.
The quality of a focus group interview depends heavily on the moderator's skill. Creating an environment where everyone can speak freely, steering the discussion without bias toward any particular opinion, and managing time according to the research agenda are all critical. Hiring an experienced moderator or engaging a research agency can significantly impact study quality.
Group design is equally important. The most common format is 6 participants per group for 2 hours. Too many participants means individual voices get lost; too few undermines group dynamics. Starting with 4–5 participants is advisable for first-time implementations.
Topic selection matters as well. FGIs are best suited for themes people feel comfortable discussing openly. Personal or sensitive subjects tend to inhibit free exchange, limiting the group dynamics effect. Product experiences, brand perceptions, and everyday purchasing behaviors make ideal FGI topics.
Finally, combining qualitative and quantitative research is highly effective. Validate FGI hypotheses through surveys, or use FGIs to explore the reasons behind trends identified in quantitative data. This balanced approach enables deeper, more reliable consumer understanding.
Focus group interviews are used across a wide range of marketing scenarios.
During new product development, showing concepts or prototypes to participants and collecting their reactions provides improvement insights before commercialization. For ad creative evaluation, presenting multiple ad concepts and comparing participant reactions helps identify the most compelling creative direction.
For existing product improvement, separating heavy users from light users into different groups reveals factors driving loyalty and causes of churn. FGIs are also valuable for mapping customer journey pain points, identifying where satisfaction peaks and frustration occurs.
Focus group interviews (FGI) are a cornerstone qualitative research method that uses small-group roundtable discussions to gather consumer insights. While group dynamics enable diverse opinions to surface, the method has limitations for probing individual deep psychology — making it most effective when combined with depth interviews and quantitative surveys.
The keys to success are clear objective setting, thoughtful group design, and skilled moderation. Define your research goals, design a solid interview guide, and translate the insights you gather into actionable marketing strategies.
Ad frequency measures the average number of times a single user sees an ad. Learn the formula, differences from reach, o...
PPC (listing) advertising costs typically range from ¥200K–500K/month. Learn how click-based pricing works, industry CPC...
Understand the differences between KGI and KPI with clear definitions, proper setup methods, and practical marketing app...
