Can Employers Cut Your Pay During a Probationary Period? Legal Limits and What to Check Before You Join
Published:
Last Updated:
Category:
Published:
Last Updated:
Category:

Authors: Shusaku Yosa
Setting a lower salary during a probationary period than after formal employment is not, in itself, illegal in Japan. However, it is only lawful if that amount was disclosed as a working condition before you joined. Cutting pay unilaterally after you start, or paying below minimum wage, is illegal.
This article draws the line between what is lawful and what is not when it comes to probationary pay, and sets out what to verify before you sign anything.
The Labor Standards Act contains no provision requiring that probationary pay match post-confirmation pay. Wage levels are set by agreement between employer and employee, so a design that lowers base pay during the probationary period, or withholds certain allowances, is valid as long as it forms part of the contract. In practice, hourly rates reduced by a modest margin during probation are common in food service, retail, and manufacturing.
Article 15 of the Labor Standards Act obliges employers to disclose the amount and calculation method of wages in writing when the employment contract is concluded. Wages are an absolute disclosure item, so a verbal explanation alone is not sufficient. It follows that if pay differs between the probationary period and afterwards, that difference must also be shown in writing before you join. A notice of working conditions stating "probationary period: 3 months, base pay during that period: X yen" is lawful. Pay reduced after you start, with no such entry, is not.
Figures in a job posting are an estimate, and do not by themselves fix the terms of your contract. That said, under the Employment Security Act, an employer that changes working conditions from what the posting stated owes a duty to disclose those changes to the applicant. If the posting said roughly 280,000 yen per month but the written notice says 240,000 yen during probation, ask for the reason and the post-confirmation figure before you sign. An employer that is evasive here is likely to take the same approach to changing your terms later on.
Some areas cannot be justified by pointing to the probationary period. If any of the following apply, the arrangement is likely unlawful even if you agreed to the figure.
The Minimum Wage Act does provide an exception allowing a reduced minimum wage for people in a trial employment period, among others. This is not, however, a mechanism employers can invoke at will: it requires individual permission from the prefectural Labour Bureau Director, and the size of the reduction is capped. Paying below minimum wage without that permission is a straightforward violation. If the figure offered to you falls under your region's minimum wage, start by asking whether permission exists.
Being told about differences in treatment can leave the impression that rights are curtailed during probation. In reality, the scope of what can be varied is narrow.
Before accepting an offer, and at the latest before signing the notice of working conditions, confirm these five points. Get each in writing rather than verbally.
Many employers set no difference at all, and where one exists it typically stays within about ten percent. A gap exceeding twenty percent, or a reduction achieved by stripping out most allowances rather than adjusting base pay, is well within the range where you are entitled to ask for an explanation.
If the notice of working conditions contains no such entry, the contract is what the notice says. Check the document first; if you are being paid a different amount from what it states, you can claim the difference. If discussion with the employer goes nowhere, consult the Labour Standards Inspection Office with jurisdiction over your workplace.
Commuting allowance is not a statutory obligation; it depends on the work rules or the employment contract. Withholding it is therefore not automatically illegal. That said, if the job posting stated that commuting costs are covered and they are not, you can raise it as a discrepancy in terms and ask for an explanation.
If the notice of working conditions states the post-confirmation figure, the employer is obliged to pay it. Where there is no figure and the document says something like "determined according to ability," there is room to negotiate, so start by asking what the assessment was based on. If no improvement looks likely, it is time to consider moving to an employer that states its terms clearly.
A reduction during probation is lawful if it was disclosed in advance and stays above minimum wage. Conversely, cutting pay unilaterally after you join, dipping below minimum wage, or skipping premium wages and social insurance cannot be justified by pointing to the probationary period. The starting point for any assessment is always the notice of working conditions, and checking it before you sign is itself the way to protect yourself.
This article sets out general principles under Japanese law. Individual cases turn on their own facts, so for a specific dispute please consult the Labour Standards Inspection Office or a qualified professional such as a lawyer.

Annual paid leave in Japan accrues automatically after six months of continuous service with at least eighty percent att...

Leave of absence (kyushoku) in Japan lets you stay employed while released from the duty to work, but it is not a statut...

The legal rules governing probationary periods in Japan, covering minimum wage, social insurance, paid leave and dismiss...